Retina New Zealand Inc
Spring Newsletter No. 27, November 2005.
In this Issue:
1 Editorial
2 From the
Retina NZ President's Desk
3 Letter to
the Editor
4 Guide dogs
from assessment to graduation
5 Learning to
love my IOL'S
6 Coping –
Foods for Eye Health
7 Research – The Science and Marketing of Dietary Supplements
8 S.A. and
G.J. Ombler Charitable Trust
9 Retina NZ
AGM and Conference
10 Snippets
11 Branch News
1 From
the Editor
Disabled
people in New Zealand have won a major victory with the publication of 'The
Accessible Journey', the report of the Human Rights Commission inquiry into
public transport in New Zealand. Many of the recommendations and requirements
of the inquiry are to be implemented by 2010 when a review of progress will
take place. The two submissions put in
on behalf of Retina NZ have been incorporated into the report which is very
exciting.
Last
month I attended the 60th ABC Conference in Auckland on behalf of Retina
NZ. Vice President Clive Lansink gave a
very interesting paper on accessibility showing how technology has begun to
marginalise blind and visually impaired people lately. Computers and stereos
are often too difficult to use, and many household appliances are now electronic
with a variety of beeps, buttons and coloured lights which are difficult to
comprehend. Clive's paper was discussed
by the other speakers including Roslyn Noonan of the Human Rights Commission. She stated that disabled people remain
amongst the most disadvantaged of New Zealand's citizens.
This
newsletter contains the promised article on training guide dogs, a member of
our executive, Denise Keay, has written about her experience with intraocular
lenses, and we have a new section called 'Snippets'. The research section examines a paper on the
dangers of dietary supplementation.
I
am now in my new home, almost unpacked, but still have a few of those 'what
shall I do with these' boxes in a wardrobe.
With the help of an interior design student I have chosen curtains,
placed furniture in rooms, and co-ordinated colours. Many hours were spent digging a new garden,
the neighbours were very concerned about my crooked lines so very kindly came
and helped me! I have planted roses,
camellias, lavenders, plus lots of flowering annuals in my garden. I have a vegetable garden which is already
providing salads and herbs, and I look forward to extending and expanding it
next year. Chocolat loves the freedom of
a fenced section, lawn, and having a big park through the gate.
I
have been the editor of the newsletter for 12 months and we are about to make
some changes to the way the newsletter is produced and printed. I would love some feedback on the newsletter
and suggestions of what I could include in the future. My phone number is 07 8533 612, my email is
editor@retina.org.nz and my mailing address is 108B Comries Rd, Hamilton.
Susan
Mellsopp
2 From
the President's Desk
We
had a successful one day conference in Auckland in August. Someone timed our AGM at 17 minutes, which
obviously excluded the roll call. That
gave us time to open the floor for any comments on what Retina NZ could be
doing. The speakers were excellent. One Aucklander said to me they wished we had
the conference in Auckland every year because they enjoyed it so much. The executive remains the same as last
year. However, we are looking for a
person with financial and reporting skills to join us. We are always keen to have people offer
themselves to get involved at a local level so that members can meet others in
their area.
Retina
NZ is an organisation of people who care.
It doesn't have a home, an office, or a building. Each person brings different skills and
networks with them to the organisation.
Retina
NZ is a network of people sharing knowledge, so our focus needs to be how to
find, manage, and share that knowledge.
It also crosses boundaries and involves collaboration with other
organisations. Our SMAB, Scientific and
Medical Advisory Board, provide us with professional expertise to ensure the
integrity of what we disseminate. There
is a flood of information available out there but it needs to be managed and
made into chunks that are useful to our members. This means it needs to be relevant and
understandable.
We
were pleased to publish our pamphlet (thanks to Kaye Clark) about detached
retinas in time for Retina week (19 ‑ 25 September). The key message is to recognise the symptoms
of a detached retina and seek eye specialist advice immediately. If you would like a copy of this pamphlet
please contact our National Secretary, Janet, at secretary@retina.org.nz or 04
476 7329. There should be no need to go
blind from detached retinas.
Our
telephone peer support line continues to receive more callers. I would like to acknowledge Petronella
Spicer's contribution in manning the line voluntarily along with Elizabeth
East. We have recruited some people to
become telephone peer supporters for the Auckland region. Further training will be held soon before
they become part of the team.
The
executive for the next year is: Janet Palmer‑National Secretary, Camille
Guy‑Vice President, Kaye Clark‑policy secretary, Denise Keay‑Wellington
branch representative, Lynn Keogh‑Dunedin representative, Elizabeth East‑National
Peer support co‑ordinator, Fraser Alexander‑International delegate,
and myself as President and representing Christchurch branch. Dr Marion Maw continues to chair the
Scientific and Medical Advisory Board.
If you wish to contact any of these people, please contact Janet Palmer
or the 0800 233 833 peer support line to get their contact details.
As
always we welcome feedback.
Kaye
Newton 03 3795 807
president@retina.org.nz
3 Letter
to the Editor
Dear
Editor
I
would like to draw attention to the fact that there is now a mobile phone on
the market designed for the more mature user that has a larger screen than
normal with good text definition. It
comes with a very easy to follow instruction manual.
It
is the Vodafone Simply. One of the other
good features of this model is that one can add contact names and numbers using
a computer keyboard and screen. The
phone has a USB cable allowing it to be connected to a computer. This makes it simple to add people to one's
list of contacts as you can cut and paste addresses already in a Word document
or the Outlook Express address book.
I
am aware that one of our Wellington members recently bought one of these
phones. She had previously not used a
cell phone as she could not read their screen easily. She has had no trouble reading the screen of
the Vodafone Simply. However, as
everyone's eye condition is slightly different I would suggest people check
whether they can read the screen before making their purchase.
Sue
Emirali - Plimmerton
4
Guide
Dogs - From Assessment to Graduation
By
Mimi Hooper
Introduction:
It
all sounds so easy ‑ assess and train a dog. It certainly isn't mystical but it does
require hard work in all weathers, reams of patience and understanding, as well
as firm, fair handling laced with love.
I should also state very clearly that it requires our dedicated puppy
walkers to have done a lot of the hard work for us ‑ toilet training,
teething (and such sharp teeth too), yapping at all hours of the night and day.
A
New Phase:
As
a trainer our job starts once the "puppies" reach approximately 12
months (it can be anywhere between 10 ‑ 18 months). They leave their Puppy Walking families and
come to the Royal New Zealand Foundation of the Blind, Guide Dog Services (GDS)
Centre in Auckland to commence their assessment and training.
These
new canine pupils are normally brought in by their families and are handed
directly to their trainer. This gives
the families a chance to meet the trainer, get to know them a bit, and discuss
what is happening over the next six months to their well loved four footed
family member. It also allows the
trainer to get to know more about the puppy's home behaviour, puppy walking
history and general upbringing. The
puppy walker then gets a chance to say good bye, which can be a very emotional
and difficult time ‑ especially for first time puppy walkers.
The
pup is bathed and mixed carefully with his/her new kennel mates and left in the
capable hands of the kennel staff until assessment and training starts with the
guide dog trainer.
Assessment:
All
dogs go through an initial assessment to evaluate their temperament and
physical nature. Some of the physical
may have already been done in the form of hip and elbow xrays when they were
neutered. This will give the team at GDS
an idea of their bone structure and confirmation.
Eye
checks by a Canine Ophthalmologist specialist are done on all dogs at 6 weeks
and then again once they reach 12 months to ensure there are no problems
brewing in this area. The dogs' vet
books and past kennel forms are checked, along with the GDS extensive health
database, so all health history can be registered on the assessment form.
The
temperament assessment consists of observing the dogs on a long lead, with
minimal handler input, in approximately 15 different environments (i.e. rural,
city, residential, night walk, shopping mall, train station home etc.)
undertaking numerous different tasks (trains, buses, open stairs, escalators,
cafe etc.).
During
this time the Trainer observes the dogs' behaviour/reactions to all
environments/tasks, noting the dogs' sensitivities, coping skills, willingness,
initiative, and whether they shows any anxiety, suspicions, or aggressive
tendencies.
At
the end of the assessment, and sometimes during this period, a decision is made
on whether to continue to the training stage or not. There are very rarely surprises at this stage
as the dogs are monitored throughout their puppyhood and are in fact constantly
under assessment.
The
puppy walkers are contacted by phone and letter to let them know how the dog
has progressed through the initial assessment, and the outcome and the
trainers' findings are recorded. They
are then contacted on a monthly basis with a phone call to update them on their
pooches' progress.
Training:
With
assessment completed, training starts.
Now the trainers have an idea of the dogs' physical and temperamental
make up they can tailor make each training program to the needs of the
individual.
The
doggy pupils are taught (at their preferred rate of learning) to guide in a
central pavement position, moving from kerb to kerb following the shape of the
road. We call this "the straight
line" ‑ perfectly straight it is not, but it is straight in a not so
symmetrical world!!!!! This is
fundamental to the guiding of the dogs future partner. It allows the person to keep themselves
orientated, and by adopting the position in the centre of the pavement it
allows the dog to move left and right to avoid obstacles.
Another
task the dog has to learn is obstacle avoidance, both moving (pedestrians) and
stationary (anything on the pavement that is not moving!!!). They have to negotiate their way out into the
road and back if the pavement is totally blocked (i.e. road works), and they
have to learn to stop at kerbs.
On
top of this the dogs have to curb their instincts ‑ not sniff, toilet,
say hello to other canine mates or people and certainly not to pick up any
food. They have to negotiate steps,
lifts, shops and some times even escalators.
They have to learn how to conduct themselves at home, socially, in
trains, buses and how to locate destinations, counters in shops, chairs etc.
Once
the canine pupils have got their paws around the basic training concepts, the
responsibility of guiding and using all their newly learnt skills to problem
solve whilst on the move are slowly passed over from the handler to the learner
guide dog. One of the best ways to do
this is by the trainer wearing a blindfold.
This also allows the trainer to assess where the dog is at in its
training and understanding.
Once
the trainer considers their pupil to be ready ‑ they are qualified and
presented for matching, much in the same way as a university student qualifies
and starts the process of job hunting.
Matching:
Twice
a year batches of qualified (and almost qualified) dogs are presented at matching
meetings. Regional guide dog instructors
from around New Zealand, and all the dog trainers, attend the matching
meeting. The dogs are presented by their
trainers both on video and "in the flesh" ‑ all dogs are viewed
over two walks. Videos and verbal
summaries of members are also presented by the instructors. All precautions are taken by providing
accurate information of dogs and members to ensure that the risk of a mismatch
is minimal.
Two
of the most important considerations when matching are the physical size of the
dog and walking speed. Many other
factors are also considered including the working and social environment that
the dog would be in, as well as the temperament of the dog and general personality
of the client.
Matching
also happens between these meetings with dogs that may have come into training
later and are therefore not ready at one of the pre‑scheduled matching
meetings, or a dog that may be a great guide but just took a bit longer to
grasp all the concepts or mature. Once a
match is made, and the member has accepted the dog offered, the team training
begins.
The
Team:
Usually
the member and their new dog are teamed up prior to the commencement of
training. This is called pre‑allocation
and is done in order for the new members of the team to become acquainted and
begin the bonding process. Bonding is an
essential ingredient in a guide dog team as it consists of respect, trust and
"love".
Teams
can be trained from home, this is called a Domiciliary, or in a group situation
which is called residential or Class. In
some residential programmes the students gather on a daily basis, going home at
night ‑ this is called centre based training; whilst others live in for
the duration of the residential programme.
During
this training period the member is taught how to communicate with their dog
through the same body positioning and verbal commands that the trainer
used. This increases the dog's
understanding of their new partner and therefore lowers their anxiety levels.
They
are taught how to work through all aspects of guide dog mobility in order to
make a safe and tidy guide dog team.
In
the case of the residential programme, the team will return home after training
with a guide dog instructor who will help them settle into their new working
environment, withdrawing support at a rate that leaves the member feeling
comfortable in their independence.
Post
Training Follow‑up:
Once
the team has graduated, they generally work independently, but post training
follow‑up visits are scheduled just to make sure things are going
okay. These are scheduled for one month,
three months, six months and twelve months after graduating ‑ or more
frequently if needed or requested. After
that initial year the follow up visits occur annually. The Team is now functioning independently.
5 Learning
to Love my IOLS (Intra-ocular lenses)
by
Denise Keay
Like
most people who read this newsletter I have shonky retinas. Mine come courtesy of very high myopia and
retinal detachments in both eyes. The
first detachment in 1979 was in my right eye; A few years later I had one in
the left. Surgery plus post‑operative
complications left me without central vision in that eye and permanent double
vision. After experimenting with contact
lenses of different strengths I worked out the best way to manage both double
vision and reliance on my right eye for near work. I needed to keep my right eye slightly short‑sighted
and boost its distance vision with prescription lens sunnies when
necessary. For a number of years I
functioned happily with corrected vision of 1/60 in the left eye, and just
below 6/12 in the right.
In
2000 I noticed the vision in my right eye was deteriorating. Movies looked blurry, and around town I was
having more trouble than usual with steps and uneven bits of footpath.
"You've got the beginnings of cataracts", said an ophthalmologist at
the hospital eye clinic, "but you won't notice for a while." (Oh, really?)
Given my dependence on my right eye ‑ which had a second retinal
detachment in the early 90's ‑ and the risk of more detachments from
surgery, I was in no hurry for a lens replacement. A couple of years later
things were grim. I lived in a bubble
with a steadily reducing radius of about 3 metres. Beyond that everything was fog. What little night vision I had went, and in
town by day I started "recognising" people, except that the people I
"recognised" couldn't possibly have been there.
Although
still anxious about the surgical risks, I put my name down on the waiting list.
I was high priority but the expected wait of 6 months came and went. By then I was having trouble seeing my
keyboard at work. The clincher was a
close squeak crossing a busy intersection and this time it was my fault, not
the motorist's. I didn't see a grey car on a grey road on a grey day.
I
decided to get the surgery done privately at a cost of around $3000 per
eye. Since I was paying I was
picky. I asked to be made short‑sighted
in the right eye by two dioptres. The
ophthalmologist suggested one‑and‑a half (which would have turned
out to be perfect), then one, but I finished up with full correction in that
eye. Being at home after the operation
was a revelation, I was dismayed by the number of cobwebs on the ceiling. I wandered round peering out windows at bits
of scenery I hadn't known were there.
That night I couldn't sleep.
Apart from the disconcerting experience of being in bed and able to see
without contacts in, the room seemed uncannily light. It was as if my eye was
permanently open. The next day I went to
the movies, sat in the back row (something I'd never done before), and still
felt too close to the screen. When I
walked through town I read number plates, signs on buildings, signs on
vans. All that "visual noise"
was exhausting, but colours were brilliant.
Not long before the operation I had helped a friend choose a colour
scheme for her house, that now had a real wow factor.
So
was my new IOL a miracle cure for very high myopia as well as the cataract?
The
answer is a qualified yes because it's taken a lot of getting used to. After living in a bubble with a steadily
reducing radius, the IOL catapulted me into a world where most things within 3
metres were a blur, and those within arms' reach nigh on invisible. I could watch TV from the kitchen (open plan
house) but not while sitting in the lounge.
Standing on a table to swipe at the ceiling's cobwebs didn't work, once
near I couldn't see them. There didn't
seem to be anything I could do at home without reading glasses or new contacts,
so the day after surgery I went back to work.
I still couldn't see the keyboard, and could only read the computer
screen by holding a magnifying glass in front of it. On the other hand, the view from our high‑rise
office was entertaining. I told my
normal‑sighted colleagues that a pink house way up on top of the hill,
whose existence I'd previously been unaware of, had brown aluminium window
frames. They weren't convinced, but I
was.
At
my check‑up the ophthalmologist was thrilled, 6/6 vision! I muttered what could someone who hadn't had
6/6 vision in 50 years be expected to do with it, and hoped he felt
deflated. He gave me a pair of hobby
specs to use until my eye (and brain) settled down enough for proper correction. Although I started wearing a contact lens in
the right eye to shorten my sight again, most of the adjustments took months
rather than weeks and there were moments when I could have screamed with
frustration.
The
IOL in my left eye had less startling results and I am back to experimenting
with different strength contacts. With a
contact lens to give full correction to the left eye it's visual acuity is
around 1/45. The contact lens for the
right eye reduces it's visual acuity to 6/9, giving me useful near vision and
perfectly adequate distance vision. If
the right eye had got the IOL in the left, and the left eye had got the IOL in
the right, life would have been simpler.
So,
with the benefit of hindsight, are there are some things I'd have done differently?
I
would have been less apprehensive about the risk of more retinal
detachments. Someone with fragile
retinas is at higher than average risk, but the level of risk is still low
while the benefits are huge. If I'd
known I was going to pay for the surgery, I'd have had it as soon as the
cataracts were diagnosed.
I
would have been more assertive about the need to be short‑sighted in my
right eye. I don't expect an
ophthalmologist to get the degree of correction spot on, but I would much
rather have finished up more short‑sighted than I expected than have full
correction. To anybody used to needing
more than 15 dioptres of correction a reduction to 2 or even 3 would seem
remarkable.
There
is no denying the IOL's are a major improvement. There are the obvious safety factors: vastly
improved night vision, and far less risk crossing roads or negotiating uneven
steps and bad footpaths by day. I no
longer see the world through a black lace curtain of floaters. It's worth noting that just as contact lenses
give better correction than glasses, and hard contacts better than soft, IOL's
give the best correction of all.
6 Coping
- Foods for Eye Health
Recent
studies on nutrients and eye health have indicated the importance of diet for
eye health. Ensuring your diet has plenty of vitamins, minerals and
antioxidants is very important. Eat few saturated fats and vegetable oils. Include foods with Vitamin C and E,
carotenoids, zinc, and omega‑fatty acids.
The
easiest way to start eating for eye health is to follow the 5‑plus rule
for fruits and vegetables. Go for
colour.
1.
Leafy dark greens like silver beet, spinach, puha and dark salad greens.
2.
Berries of all kinds: black, blue and red.
3.
Orange, yellow and red vegetables: pumpkin, carrots, sweet corn and kumera.
4.
Orange, yellow and red fruits: citrus fruits, apricots, persimmon, papaya,
plums, rock melon, watermelon and tomato which is technically a fruit.
5.
Cruciferous vegetables: broccoli, cabbage, bok choy and brussel sprouts.
6. Fish, particularly shellfish, and 'fatty'
fish like tuna, salmon and sardines‑fresh or canned.
7. Nuts, raw or dry‑roasted‑walnuts,
brazils, almonds and pine‑nuts.
8.
Beans
9.
Lean meats
10.
Olive oil‑to make dressings and for cooking.
This
information was provided by the New Zealand Association of Optometrists Inc
Research
7 The
Science and Marketing of Dietary Supplements
Editorial: Frederick W. Fraunfelder MD
American
Journal of Ophthalmology. 140, 2005: 302‑304
Dietary
supplements are estimated to be a $60 billion industry worldwide. Only half of those who take supplements
report using them to their Doctor. There
is strong evidence that many herbal preparations have pharmacologic effects,
and severe adverse reactions can occur.
This is highlighted by the Food and Drug Administration ban on
supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids such as ephedra. Touted as a potential stimulant and weight‑loss
agent, this substance was banned after being linked with adverse cardiovascular
and neurologic effects and, in some cases, death.
Examples
abound of prescription drug interactions with many dietary supplements. These include ginkgo biloba, which, when
combined with aspirin or Coumadin, can increase bleeding time and has also been
associated with retinal hemorrhage.
Licorice interacts with diuretics and cardiac glycosides, and can lead
to dangerously low potassium levels and digitalis toxicity. Echinacea decreases
the efficacy of immunologic drugs such as cyclosporine.
Identification
and awareness of adverse events associated with herbal supplement use is
limited by the voluntary nature of post‑marketing surveillance for dietary
supplements. It falls to consumers to
report adverse reactions and, without knowledge of these products' potential
effects, their association with many reactions may go unrecognised.
Systemic
adverse events are often not recognised until much later. In the United States the Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act permits the FDA to stop the marketing of products that make
unsubstantiated "drug" claims, and to remove from the market products
that cause dangerous adverse reactions.
The FDA must prove that a supplement is dangerous before it can be
removed from the market. Surveillance of
nutritional supplements thus becomes critical, because safety information is
often absent. Also, there is no assurance that products actually contain the
ingredients listed on their labels (for example 50% of ginseng products contain
no ginseng).
Currently,
labelling on dietary supplements may list structure or function claims such as
herb A promotes healthy eyes, but not herb A treats glaucoma. Because of this lax marketing restriction
misleading claims appear in print and on the internet. A study published in the Journal of the
American Medical Association reviewed 443 websites advertising dietary
supplements. It noted that 55% of
retailers made illegal claims about treatment, prevention, diagnosis, and cure
of specific diseases through self treatment with herbal medicines and
nutritional supplements.
Ophthalmologists
are usually the first to witness adverse effects because many dietary
supplements can cause ocular side effects. Some of the most significant adverse
effects occur with Echinacea (irritative conjunctivitis), chamomile (allergic
conjunctivitis), ginkgo biloba (hyphema, retinal haemorrhage, retrobulbar
haemorrhage), licorice (blurred vision, migraine‑associated visual
scotomas), niacin (cystoid macular edema in dosing >3.5g daily, blurred
vision), Vitamin A (pseudotumor cerebri, in large doses), datura (mydriasis),
and canthaxanthine (crystalline retinopathy, electro‑retinogram
abnormalities).
Dietary
supplements may ultimately be proven beneficial in the right dosage, and many
ophthalmologists may need to learn how they can be used. Flax seed oil, primrose oil and fish oil show
promise in the treatment of dry eye syndrome.
Anti‑oxidant vitamins may have a role in the late‑stage
treatment of age‑related macular degeneration. Anthocyanosides (bilberry) has been suggested
as having positive effects on night vision. N‑acetylcarnosine eye drops
are a leading seller worldwide because of the belief that they prevent
cataracts. Unfortunately very few
controlled clinical trials have studied dietary supplements so the observed
side effects are subjective and clinicians lack information on dosing,
efficacy, safety, and drug interactions.
The
natural product industry argues that most dietary supplements are safe,
especially when taken in proper doses.
They also argue prescription drugs do much more harm because significant
morbidity and mortality are rare from dietary supplements. While these statements may have some
validity, key data is still lacking on these products' safety, proper dosage,
manufacturing, common side effects, drug interactions, risks in pregnant women,
effects on systemic diseases, pharmacokinetics and more. Controlled clinical
trials could provide answers. A strong
argument can be made that many dietary supplements should be regulated in the
same way as prescription medications.
World
Health Organisation guidelines provide some information on the cultivation,
collection, classification, quality control, storage, labelling, distribution
and post‑marketing surveillance of herbal medicines.
It
is hoped that the future of the dietary supplement industry will include a
focus on scientific research. This
should include phytochemical profiling, toxicology and pharmacokinetic studies
in animals and humans along with standardisation of manufacturing, processing
and quality control of herbal products. This will provide patients with safety
and efficacy, and the added knowledge will benefit clinicians and the public.
8 S.A.
and G.J. Ombler Charitable Trust
Two
summer scholarships have been awarded this year by the trust. They are:
1.
Title: Quantitative analysis of
compressive optic neuropathies with optical coherence tomography and Heidelberg
retina tomography and correlation of morphological appearance of the optic
nerve with visual field defects.
Supervisor:
Associate Professor Helen Danesh‑Meyer, Department of Ophthalmology
Student: Yu Hwee Tan
The
specific aims of this study include: to
evaluate the hypothesis that retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness,
macular thickness and macular volume correlates to visual field indices (tests)
in compressive optic neuropathies.
To
determine whether macular thickness and volume correlate with RNFL thickness in
its association with compressive optic neuropathies.
To
evaluate the role of the Optic Coherence Tomograph (OCT) and the Heidelberg
Retina Tomograph (HRT) in diagnosing structural changes in the optic nerve head
and the surrounding nerve layers due to compression optic neuropathies.
2.
Biochemical consequences of bright light exposure in RP rat models.
Aim: To investigate the underlying metabolic
defects caused by light damage in a rat model of retinal degeneration.
Supervisor: Professor Michael Kalloniatis
Student: Cheong Yih Liang
9 Successful
Retina NZ Inc AGM and Conference
A
successful AGM and conference was held in Auckland on the 27th of August. The election of officers was followed by
three speakers; Dr Marion Maw of Retina's Scientific and Medical Advisory
Board; Professor Michael Kalloniatis of the Department of Optometry and Vision
Science, University of Auckland; and Professor Charles McGhee from the
Department of Ophthalmology at the University of Auckland. A panel discussion
of four members who represented a range of eye conditions followed.
Photograph:
Our three guest speakers: Professor Michael Kalloniatis, Dr Marion Maw and
Professor Charles McGhee.
Dr
Marion Maw
Dr
Marion Maw, the Chairperson of SMAB, Retina New Zealand's Scientific and
Medical Advisory Board, spoke on the role of this board. She explained that
meetings were held via telephone and email, and that the complete group had
never met. The Board contributes to
Retina NZ publications, and helps New Zealand patients to access new treatments
and research developments, both clinical and genetic. SMAB has links with
international retina organisations. Dr
Maw also spoke about the possibility of registries to link practitioners,
patients and treatments.
She
then discussed recent research being conducted into understanding the
pathogenesis of AMD. Although an understanding of the causes of AMD is
incomplete, the immune system appears to play an important role. The retinal
pigment epithelial cells seem to be attacked by the immune system. Moreover, a
component of the immune system has recently been implicated in genetic
susceptibility to AMD. This component is
called complement factor H. One particular variant of the complement factor H
gene is twice as common in people with AMD than it is in people without AMD. Dr Maw noted that understanding the causes of
AMD should bring about a shift from treatments targeted at late‑stage
symptoms to strategies that prevent progression of early stages of the disease.
Professor
Michael Kalloniatis
Professor
Kalloniatis spoke about his research on retinitis pigmentosa, particularly his
clinical research into retinal neuro‑chemistry and neurobiology.
Firstly,
he described the use of mouse models to discover how the retina develops. This has highlighted early evidence of
degeneration in the photoreceptor cells. Secondly, Professor Kalloniatis
explained that he has examined retinal metabolisms to determine how the retina
derives energy, breaking down glucose as an energy source for the
photoreceptors. He has stressed the
mouse retina by reducing its glucose and oxygen to see if the retina can
develop a secondary energy source.
Professor
Kalloniatis hopes this research can be used to alter the rate of photoreceptor
degeneration, possibly through a diet rich in Vitamin A, derived from fish
oils. It is already well known that some
AMD patients benefit from a diet high in anti‑oxidants.
His
research has also concluded that a large ion flow triggers cell death and this
could be a possible trigger for photoreceptor degeneration. Minimising exposure to light, particularly bright
light which can cause damage to those with RP, is very important.
Professor
Charles N. McGhee
Professor
McGhee spoke about cataracts, noting that when he first came to New Zealand
little data was available on cataract surgery.
Cataracts occur for several reasons; the primary ones are age, diabetes,
steroids, trauma, retinal disorders, inflammation, congenital cataracts ‑
particularly those caused by exposure to toxoplasmosis, and genetic
factors. There are many types of
cataract, and a general loss of visual function occurs in tandem with the
development of cataracts. They also
occur as the result of other eye disease such as glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy
and hypertension.
Professor
McGhee explained that cataract surgery began in India 4000 years ago. The first intraocular lens, invented by Sir
Harold Ridley, was inserted into the eye in 1949. Their use has been routine since 1985. The lenses are made from acrylic and are
inserted in a three step process. The
cataract is subject to photo emulsification, then a hollow needle and
ultrasound are used to remove the cataract.
The new lens is folded in half and is then inserted through a 3mm
incision. It can take up to one month for vision to improve following this
surgery.
The
Auckland cataract project has found that 75% of cataract patients are female,
98‑99% achieve a successful result following surgery, and that up to 1
1/2% can be worse off following surgery.
Professor
McGhee also described the development of an implantable miniature telescope
which can be inserted in the lens area.
It enlarges the image by 3x magnification and can bring a gain of a
couple of lines on the eye chart, its use is mainly for reading.
Panel
Discussion
A
panel of four members, Fraser Alexander, Susan Mellsopp, Major Thelma Smith and
Kiran Valabh, answered questions about their sight loss. These included its social and emotional
impact on their lives, family reactions, its influence on their working life,
sources of help and advice, and the positive aspects sight loss had on their
lives. Answers were varied and
interesting, with a theme of coping, help from the RNZFB and friends, and a
need just to get on with life predominating.
When asked what they would have done differently the panel members felt
that asking for help earlier rather than later was important.
Photograph:
Kaye Clark, Kiren Valabh, Major Thelma Smith, Camille Guy, Susan Mellsopp and
Fraser Alexander.
10 Snippets
Peer
Support Reference Manual
Retina
New Zealand launched its Peer Support Reference manual as a resource for the
peer support team in late August. Partially funded by a grant from the AMD
Alliance, the manual was written by the National Peer Support Coordinator
Elizabeth East. Information in the manual has been obtained from several
different sources including the Royal New Zealand Foundation of the Blind,
staff from various Government departments and agencies, the New Zealand
Association of Optometrists, and members of Retina NZ.
The
manual has been produced in normal print, large print and on a CD. The subjects covered were sourced from the
wide range of questions asked by those contacting the 0800 number since its
inception. These include: an overview of
the different eye conditions, sunglasses and eye health, employment related
support, the total mobility scheme, web based information for those with low
vision, living with sight loss, leisure options and audio book technology. The information included in these and other
sections of the manual is used by the peer support team when answering calls to
the peer support service which operates nationwide on 0800 233 833.
The
Three Blind Mice
Three
members of Retina NZ ordered a taxi to transport them from Awhina House to the
Sky City bus terminal in Auckland following the AGM. On arrival at the bus
terminal one member with partial sight held two guide dogs and with their help,
one in each hand, safely negotiated the steps and crossed the road to the bus
terminal. The almost totally blind
member retrieved 3 suitcases from the boot of the taxi, and without being able
to use her dog found her way up the steps and across the road with two of the
suitcases in tow. The third member, who
had been paying for the taxi, had a white cane in her backpack and was spotted by
a member of the public who suggested that perhaps she might like some
assistance to cross the road to the bus terminal. She was carefully escorted by
the said member of the public to safety. The three members, who are still
laughing at this incident, have been left wondering just which of them was seen
as the most blind!!!
11 Branch
News
Waikato
Support Group - Susan Mellsopp
A
very successful meeting of Waikato members was held at Susan Mellsopp's new
home on the 30th of August. 17 people
including members, their drivers and family members attended. One member celebrated their 91st birthday at
the meeting. Following introductions
Elizabeth East, National Peer Support Coordinator, spoke on her experience of
sight loss in a talk entitled 'Will I be Blind by Easter or
Christmas". She followed this with
some advice on healthy eating for healthy eyes.
This has been included in the coping section of this newsletter.
Lynn
Keogh, Chairperson of the Otago/Southland Branch, spoke on her experience of
attending Outward Bound which included rafting, sailing, tramping, camping,
rock climbing and abseiling. She also
described participating in a triathlon, tramping in the Eglington Valley in
Fiordland, and cycling the Central Otago rail trail which goes from Clyde to
Middlemarch. Lynn encouraged members not
to restrict their lifestyle because of sight loss.
Afternoon
tea brought the chance to share, get to know other members and plan future
meetings. It is hoped to have another
get‑together in November. For
further information please contact Susan Mellsopp on 853 3612.
Christchurch
Branch - Kaye Newton
About
30 people attended our meeting on the 19th of August when Dr Caroline Lintott
was the guest speaker. She is a senior
genetic associate for the Central and Southern Genetic Services. Her talk was specifically aimed at our
audience and covered both RP and MD, and she explained the core concepts of
genes and DNA. This was followed by a discussion where members had been asked
to bring handy hints to share. One
member brought along his gardening tools with bright fluro coloured
handles. This was followed by
refreshments and the usual lively conversation.
Our
end of year gathering is to be held at the RNZFB meeting room, 96 Bristol
Street, Christchurch, on Saturday the 26th of November at 5.30 pm for an
evening meal. Please bring a salad. Any visitors from other regions would be most
welcome.
Otago/Southland
Branch - Lynn Keogh
All
members and friends of the branch are cordially invited to a finger food
luncheon to be held at the Belleknowes Golf Club on Sunday 4 December 2005 from
12 noon to 3.00 pm. Please RSVP by
Thursday 1 December to Helen Adams by telephoning her on 03 467 2278 or email
at hgadams@slingshot.co.nz or to Dawn Cole by telephoning her on 04 487
8972. We look forward to seeing you all
there.
For
inquiries regarding a List of Publications which are available from Retina NZ,
please contact Janet Palmer, National Secretary, telephone (04) 299 1801 or
write to Retina NZ, P.O. Box 17-242, Wellington or email
secretary@retina.org.nz
DO
YOU NEED HELP OR ADVICE?
The
Retina NZ Peer Support programme is a free and confidential service, operating
nationwide. To make contact with one of
Retina New Zew Zealand's peer suppporters, telephone 0800 233 833. All calls are treated in strict confidence.
Ring
any of the following freephone numbers if you want to speak to a geneticist or
genetic counsellor about your own particular diagnosis of RP, Macular
Degeneration or other retinal degenerative disorders:
Auckland
Genetic Hotline
(Northern
Regional Genetic Service) 0800
476 123
Wellington
Genetic Hotline 0508
364 436
Christchurch
Genetic Hotline 0508
364 436